There's a figure in the darkness. She's high up. No telling how she got there, standing a hundred floors high on building that shines like one solid mirror. The color of the sky changes in the panes of glass and in her black, black eyes. They reflect everything and evince nothing, the dark guileless eyes of a Goddess.
She watches the city breathe around her. Under the maddening sky, they don't seem to notice the brisk fragility of their lives, the tenouousness with which they grasp at things. They can only see that which is directly before them: the dry cleaning, the day at work, the dinner tonight, the fight with their mother, the holiday shopping annoyances. They march forward relentlessly, a never ending parade of sameness, mirrors against mirrors. She watches them, cocks her head curiously at them. They don't see her, they never do. How could they? She is in the sky and they never look up.
She watches the horizon until her chest fills up with its beauty. It hurts to breathe. There's no more time, if there ever was time in the first place.She closes her eyes and still sees the world behind her eyelids. There is no way to shut it out; it's a part of her now. She's part of it. She's part of everything.
It's easy to fall. She just walks out, stretches her arms forward out and pulls it around her like a blanket. The sky, the wind, the clouds, they pluck impishly at her skin as she goes past. She is not afraid. She smiles.She opens her eyes. It's time. She stretches her arms out and embraces it. Sure enough, the wind fills her up like a parachute. Just before she hits the ground, she sweeps up in a delicate arc. Her body spins around like a bullet, effortlessly peircing the air around her. She rockets into the sky even faster than she fell. As she reaches the clouds, she stretches them out again. She floats for a moment, over them all, and her laughter rings out like snowflakes. She swoops and dives again, on wings they can't see and won't see, wings they will never know she had.
“The imitator dooms himself to hopeless mediocrity. The inventor did it, because it was natural to him, and so in him it has a charm. In the imitator, something else is natural, and he bereaves himself of his own beauty, to come short of another man's.” Ralph Waldo Emerson
Monday, December 29, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
My Subconscious is Extremely Impractical
I've never been entirely sure if there is a huge difference between writers and schizophrenics. I think most writers live with an internal dialogue that they may or may not be able to identify as themselves. I know I have a voice in there, which I'm pretty sure is my own. But every now and then it comes up with something so bizarre or taunting that I really begin to wonder.
There's been a narrator in there for as long as I can remember, throwing out helpful descriptions of the landacape "the clouds billowed dangerously in the sky like a group of bullying children in the schoolyard" or just narrating my own actions in an annyoingly pretentious way, "She had known she didn't love him; but she seen her worth only in terms of what he could give her." It can be a little smug at times, but I don't want it to go away. Beecause it's also the voice I hear when I feel depressed or confused. It's almost always cheering me on, a little bit of hope that reaches out to me, and reminds me of the things that I really believe in.
But today, the voice told me something unusual. I was walking back up the stairs to my office, and I looked out at the sky overhead. It's something I frequently do when I'm trying to feel better. This kind of "looking up" reminds me that there's more out there, and that I just need to have the right kind of thinking to see it. But today as I looked outside, the voice quite clearly told me, "You could walk out the door and never come back." I would have almost called it a taunt, if it had not come in such a gentle, reassuring way. It wasn't making fun of me. It was just a reminder, that I am free.
I was surprised however, that my subconcious, so acutely aware of my current unhappiness, was reminding me of my freeedom to choose. Of course, it is the practical, rational choice, but it is a still a choice that I consciously make. I come here, out of my own free will, every day. I like tell myself I need to be here, that I need the money, and this almost completely true. But I am always choosing this for myself, whether conscious or unconscious, and that choice always available to me is the option to walk out the door and never come back.
*Big deep breath*
My inner voice is much, much braver than me.
There's been a narrator in there for as long as I can remember, throwing out helpful descriptions of the landacape "the clouds billowed dangerously in the sky like a group of bullying children in the schoolyard" or just narrating my own actions in an annyoingly pretentious way, "She had known she didn't love him; but she seen her worth only in terms of what he could give her." It can be a little smug at times, but I don't want it to go away. Beecause it's also the voice I hear when I feel depressed or confused. It's almost always cheering me on, a little bit of hope that reaches out to me, and reminds me of the things that I really believe in.
But today, the voice told me something unusual. I was walking back up the stairs to my office, and I looked out at the sky overhead. It's something I frequently do when I'm trying to feel better. This kind of "looking up" reminds me that there's more out there, and that I just need to have the right kind of thinking to see it. But today as I looked outside, the voice quite clearly told me, "You could walk out the door and never come back." I would have almost called it a taunt, if it had not come in such a gentle, reassuring way. It wasn't making fun of me. It was just a reminder, that I am free.
I was surprised however, that my subconcious, so acutely aware of my current unhappiness, was reminding me of my freeedom to choose. Of course, it is the practical, rational choice, but it is a still a choice that I consciously make. I come here, out of my own free will, every day. I like tell myself I need to be here, that I need the money, and this almost completely true. But I am always choosing this for myself, whether conscious or unconscious, and that choice always available to me is the option to walk out the door and never come back.
*Big deep breath*
My inner voice is much, much braver than me.
Friday, November 28, 2008
Why Am I Writing This?
This is the question I grapple with more than any other. I feel like, if I am asking myself this question so frequently, maybe I shouldn't be writing this story. Maybe I should spend my time on something I feel is more meaningful, since I seem to be having issues with the book. I frequently second-guess both my motivation for writing it and the quality of the book. (Who cares about this story? is the question I hear most in my head.) I don't generally have confidence issues so the fact that I'm having so much trouble with this book should tell me something? Or should it? Maybe every writer goes through this.
Usually, when I'm done pissing away a bunch of time worrying about this, I come to the conclusion that I'm writing this story because it's fun. I enjoy the world I created, the characters, and the complete absurdity of the situations they find themselves in. I can't constantly ask myself if this is cliche or if it isn't; I can't be always bothering about whether this is fresh, innovative, or interesting. I just need to write the story, and write it to please myself.
It's ironic to me to discover that my biggest issue is worrying about what other people think of my book. I'm supposed to be the kind of person who doesn't care about that. And if not the kind of person I am, at the very least writers can't concern themselves with those thoughts. I have to just go for it here, and not worry about what's going to happen with it. I have to allow myself to suck if that's what's going to happen. I have to remind myself that everything I write isn't going to be of the utmost important. Some of it will have to be tossed away. I just have to write, write, and keep writing until one or both of my hands fall off. It's the only way I'm going to get anything good.
Usually, when I'm done pissing away a bunch of time worrying about this, I come to the conclusion that I'm writing this story because it's fun. I enjoy the world I created, the characters, and the complete absurdity of the situations they find themselves in. I can't constantly ask myself if this is cliche or if it isn't; I can't be always bothering about whether this is fresh, innovative, or interesting. I just need to write the story, and write it to please myself.
It's ironic to me to discover that my biggest issue is worrying about what other people think of my book. I'm supposed to be the kind of person who doesn't care about that. And if not the kind of person I am, at the very least writers can't concern themselves with those thoughts. I have to just go for it here, and not worry about what's going to happen with it. I have to allow myself to suck if that's what's going to happen. I have to remind myself that everything I write isn't going to be of the utmost important. Some of it will have to be tossed away. I just have to write, write, and keep writing until one or both of my hands fall off. It's the only way I'm going to get anything good.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
The Inexorable Pull of Romance
Now don't get me wrong here. I'm not trying to criticize, though I can't say I haven't criticized it, openly, vocally, and energetically in the past week. But I just don't understand the obsession with Twilight. I logged on to facebook this morning to the astonishing news that one of my friends had become a fan of Edward Cullen. If you don't know (and I don't know how you can't) that is the male romantic lead from Stephanie Meyer's ridiculously popular novel. He's attractive, charming, chivalrous, and drinks blood. Yes, he's a vampire folks. Enter drama, and most of all, angst angst angst.
Wasn't it Poe who said that adding a little tragedy made something even more beautiful? I'm paraphrasing, but it seems to hold true, at least in this case. You can look at any of the timeless classics and see that star-crossed lovers is a story that sells. Better yet, make it teenagers, and we have the added bonus of the novelty of discovering these things anew. High school romance is a pretty shallow pool to play in, but add a little eternal damnation to the mix and you have yourself a story, and a strangely compelling one, at that.
But what is it exactly that makes it so every woman between 13-30 is attracted to this character of Edward Cullen? As I scrolled through the pictures (241 of them posted at the time of this writing) I noticed a certain theme. Many people had superimposed themselves into the picture with him. One person had been so bold as to admit, in textual format, that she was in love with a fictional character. How is such a thing even possible? Can you really love someone you've never interacted with; find kinship with someone who has never (and will never) exist? What is it that these people are looking for?
And then I saw it: eternity.
Eternity is a fucking long span of time. And when you really think about it, it's frightening. They say that no matter who is with you, you come into this world and you leave it alone. If you think too long or too hard about starting on either one of those journeys, it can be terrifying. And we've been trying, for as long as we've existed, to alleviate that fear. There is an obsession on the part of humanity to find permanance in a world that is anything but.
It's difficult to find love, and even more difficult to find love that lasts. The concept of a vampire, an immortal being, in love with you is intoxicating. Think about it: a person who has existed for hundreds of years, met thousands of people, and never fallen in love. And then he meets one person, one clumsy, imperfect, everywoman (and here's where we all can relate) and he's in love. And not just any kind of love, but the kind we know will last. He knows all about eternity; he's had that long and longer to think about it. And he loves me--I mean her-- how amazing is that?
It's incredibly amazing. Especially now, in a time where cheating is expected if not condoned by much of society. I'm not religious by any definition of the term but I do find the degredation of the sanctity of relationships extremely disturbing. It's as if the entire human race is afraid to believe in permanance anymore. The closer we get to answers about the universe, the farther we get from believing we are an important part of it. We are tiny, we are inconsequential, and our actions don't matter. But this is where we're wrong.
This is why people (and women in particular) reach out to these characters and fantasies that they find in books and movies. They crave this kind of love, need it as badly as breathing or eating. They are waiting for the great sweeping romance that will change their lives and make everything different. They want permanance, even if it's not for the world. Permanance for them is good enough.
Women want an Edward Cullen to make them believe that love can last for eternity. They want to be the most important part of someone else's world. The problem with though is when they finally do encounter someone who possesses the ability to love like that, they run away from it. Society programs you to think that these kinds of feelings are silly and inspid. Obsessiveness is frightening. So herein lies the problem: the very thing they desire is the thing they are made to find fearful.
It's interesting to me that we live in a society full of such contradiction that someone could "love" a character in a fantasy novel but look down on a man who loves someone with the same kind of ardor as "suffocating" or "boring."
We love you Edward Cullen. As long you remain a fantasy.
Wasn't it Poe who said that adding a little tragedy made something even more beautiful? I'm paraphrasing, but it seems to hold true, at least in this case. You can look at any of the timeless classics and see that star-crossed lovers is a story that sells. Better yet, make it teenagers, and we have the added bonus of the novelty of discovering these things anew. High school romance is a pretty shallow pool to play in, but add a little eternal damnation to the mix and you have yourself a story, and a strangely compelling one, at that.
But what is it exactly that makes it so every woman between 13-30 is attracted to this character of Edward Cullen? As I scrolled through the pictures (241 of them posted at the time of this writing) I noticed a certain theme. Many people had superimposed themselves into the picture with him. One person had been so bold as to admit, in textual format, that she was in love with a fictional character. How is such a thing even possible? Can you really love someone you've never interacted with; find kinship with someone who has never (and will never) exist? What is it that these people are looking for?
And then I saw it: eternity.
Eternity is a fucking long span of time. And when you really think about it, it's frightening. They say that no matter who is with you, you come into this world and you leave it alone. If you think too long or too hard about starting on either one of those journeys, it can be terrifying. And we've been trying, for as long as we've existed, to alleviate that fear. There is an obsession on the part of humanity to find permanance in a world that is anything but.
It's difficult to find love, and even more difficult to find love that lasts. The concept of a vampire, an immortal being, in love with you is intoxicating. Think about it: a person who has existed for hundreds of years, met thousands of people, and never fallen in love. And then he meets one person, one clumsy, imperfect, everywoman (and here's where we all can relate) and he's in love. And not just any kind of love, but the kind we know will last. He knows all about eternity; he's had that long and longer to think about it. And he loves me--I mean her-- how amazing is that?
It's incredibly amazing. Especially now, in a time where cheating is expected if not condoned by much of society. I'm not religious by any definition of the term but I do find the degredation of the sanctity of relationships extremely disturbing. It's as if the entire human race is afraid to believe in permanance anymore. The closer we get to answers about the universe, the farther we get from believing we are an important part of it. We are tiny, we are inconsequential, and our actions don't matter. But this is where we're wrong.
This is why people (and women in particular) reach out to these characters and fantasies that they find in books and movies. They crave this kind of love, need it as badly as breathing or eating. They are waiting for the great sweeping romance that will change their lives and make everything different. They want permanance, even if it's not for the world. Permanance for them is good enough.
Women want an Edward Cullen to make them believe that love can last for eternity. They want to be the most important part of someone else's world. The problem with though is when they finally do encounter someone who possesses the ability to love like that, they run away from it. Society programs you to think that these kinds of feelings are silly and inspid. Obsessiveness is frightening. So herein lies the problem: the very thing they desire is the thing they are made to find fearful.
It's interesting to me that we live in a society full of such contradiction that someone could "love" a character in a fantasy novel but look down on a man who loves someone with the same kind of ardor as "suffocating" or "boring."
We love you Edward Cullen. As long you remain a fantasy.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Breaking Through
This is blog one. I am hoping there will be blogs 2, 3, 4, and 1005 someday, so it's a good place to start. This is a place for me to try to sort out the ideas that come around in my head; for me to get the insignifica out of my way and concentrate on what matters. And that's writing.
It's funny to me to think of writers who didn't intend to start out that way. Writers who had an idea and just lived with it; thought about it and cared for it like it was a child. And then to have it actually work out in the end. To have someone look at that carefully tended thing that wasn't meant for outside eyes, and to say, "That's something to share."
I want to make something to share.
Do I need to think of it more like it was something personal of mine? Some part of me that can live without ever seeing the light of day and that would all right? Because I don't see that way. My writing has never been any more mine than the ideas that came to me. I don't make up things. Whenever I do, they seem small and ugly in comparison to the things I uncover. I see stories like they are truths, previously unexamined and unexplored areas that come to light with the assistance of a knowing guide. I don't write these things. I discover them, and then I show them to everyone. They're not mine to keep, and so it becomes a responsibilty to share them. And that's where the burden comes. They live! They live without me, they existed before me, they'll exist when I'm gone. They want me to tell their story, if I can. But I don't have control over them. I'm just the spectator who stumbled across them one day when I wasn't paying attention. I see them, I write about what I see.
But what happens when I don't see? When the difficulties and stress of the life I only grudgingly live (the monotonous and unforgiving office job, the bills I pay without understanding why) are too much to slough off in pursuit of my escapist land where my characters live? What happens when a wall starts to get built there, and brick by brick, it's more difficult for me to see into their lives and their hearts? What happens when I forget them for awhile? Do they forget me too?
I have a strange land inside my head. That's nothing new. Tolkien did too; a great sweeping middle earth, filled with language and culture and stories, so many of them that you couldn't see every layer if you tried. CS Lewis created a world too. Madeline L'Engle. Piers Anthony. It's their place, it's where they live when they're happy. I have that place too. But what if I can't always get in? What if the wardrobe doesn't always open for me? What then?
What then for me?
It's funny to me to think of writers who didn't intend to start out that way. Writers who had an idea and just lived with it; thought about it and cared for it like it was a child. And then to have it actually work out in the end. To have someone look at that carefully tended thing that wasn't meant for outside eyes, and to say, "That's something to share."
I want to make something to share.
Do I need to think of it more like it was something personal of mine? Some part of me that can live without ever seeing the light of day and that would all right? Because I don't see that way. My writing has never been any more mine than the ideas that came to me. I don't make up things. Whenever I do, they seem small and ugly in comparison to the things I uncover. I see stories like they are truths, previously unexamined and unexplored areas that come to light with the assistance of a knowing guide. I don't write these things. I discover them, and then I show them to everyone. They're not mine to keep, and so it becomes a responsibilty to share them. And that's where the burden comes. They live! They live without me, they existed before me, they'll exist when I'm gone. They want me to tell their story, if I can. But I don't have control over them. I'm just the spectator who stumbled across them one day when I wasn't paying attention. I see them, I write about what I see.
But what happens when I don't see? When the difficulties and stress of the life I only grudgingly live (the monotonous and unforgiving office job, the bills I pay without understanding why) are too much to slough off in pursuit of my escapist land where my characters live? What happens when a wall starts to get built there, and brick by brick, it's more difficult for me to see into their lives and their hearts? What happens when I forget them for awhile? Do they forget me too?
I have a strange land inside my head. That's nothing new. Tolkien did too; a great sweeping middle earth, filled with language and culture and stories, so many of them that you couldn't see every layer if you tried. CS Lewis created a world too. Madeline L'Engle. Piers Anthony. It's their place, it's where they live when they're happy. I have that place too. But what if I can't always get in? What if the wardrobe doesn't always open for me? What then?
What then for me?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)